Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (4) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.73 out of 10 (190g / 6,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX
