Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 4000 FCX and Delphin SHARX 6000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 4000 FCX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin SHARX 6000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano FX?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
- Solid value at €18.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
