Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (4) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X
Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX