Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
