Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
54.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX
Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX