Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a durability of 5.72 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
