Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 1200X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa TANACOM 1200X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X
