Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 1200X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Daiwa TANACOM 1200X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
