Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
59.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight289g / 10.19oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X edges out Delphin IXTREK 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.72 out of 10). Still, Delphin IXTREK 4000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Delphin IXTREK?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Delphin IXTREK 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (289g / 10,19oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
