Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 160/0.16
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 1200X, offering significantly better performance in weight (210g / 7,41oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Daiwa TANACOM 1200X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Shimano Stella FK 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
