Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
