Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa TANACOM 800X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 800X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.71 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
