Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 800X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Daiwa TANACOM 800X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
