Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
