Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (135g / 4,76oz). While Shimano Sienna 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sienna and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sienna 4000X
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.1 out of 10 (135g / 4,76oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
