Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW
Spinning
2000x
55.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €57.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.63 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
