Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.63 out of 10) and total score (6.97 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
