Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the weight (185g / 6,53oz). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 8kg and a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Shimano Stradic FM?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
