Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
71.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X clearly outshines Daiwa TD Match 3012X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa TD Match 3012X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD Match and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa TD Match 3012X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
