Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
