Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1/3.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank106 centimeter / 41.73 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/440

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX and Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 106 centimeter / 41.73 inch, while Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Shimano Stradic FM?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.73 out of 10 (106 centimeter / 41.73 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
