Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
