Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
