Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
