Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Torium
Multireels
83.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag14kg / 30.86lbs
Weight790g / 27.87oz
Line retireve per crank116 centimeter / 45.67 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €279.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.6/429

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX offers a gear ratio of 5.1:1, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Torium and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
