Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and weight (165g / 5,82oz). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Beastmaster
