Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
