Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €13.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/245
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Delphin BRONZ 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin BRONZ 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
