Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin INKS 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Delphin INKS 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Delphin INKS 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 250g / 8,82oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin INKS 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
