Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 750 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
