Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
