Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX
