Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Catana FE?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
