Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano FX?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
