Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a weight of 240g / 8,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
