Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
68.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Tanacom 500 offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
