Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Shimano Sienna 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Sienna?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sienna 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.5 out of 10 (225g / 7,94oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin HORNET 60X
