Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) and gear ratio (5.7:1). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
