Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
82.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (180g / 6,35oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Shimano Vanford FA?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
