Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
