Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 750 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 750 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX
