Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 750 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 750 holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
