Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 750 edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.7 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 240g / 8,47oz and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 750 and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
