Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY

Spinning

47.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.68 out of 10

Ergonomics6.47 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight159g / 5.61oz

Line retireve per crank0 inch

Ball bearings10+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €85.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

84.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €195.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency