Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (8). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
