Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (18kg / 39,68lbs) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 80WAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Shimano Tiagra?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (176g / 6,21oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (18kg / 39,68lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
