Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ANTIGRAVITY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
