Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €13.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/245

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
90.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.9:1 / 1.7:1
Maximum drag16kg / 35.27lbs
Weight1575g / 55.56oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.95 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €524.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30WLRSA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (16kg / 35,27lbs) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.95 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Shimano Tiagra?
Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
- With a serious drag score of 9.6 out of 10 (16kg / 35,27lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.95 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
