Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/270

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19
Spinning
3000x
86.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19?
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX
