Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
